Research note 001 More compute. Same breakfast.Read the finding ↗
Crumb AxiomIndependent breakfast research

The Institute for Toast Alignment

Intelligence,
to taste.

We taught a machine to make perfect toast.
Then we asked a human what “perfect” meant.

01 /

One small breakfast.
One inconvenient
alignment problem.

Find your preference ↓

Open experiment / 001

Does your toaster know you?

Interactive toy model
Fig. 01 — Preference apparatusRecipe level 5
INPUTTASTEHUMAN IN THE LOOP

More heat is easy.
Knowing when to stop is the research.

T—01
Tabletop series
Your preferenceUncalibrated
Recipe match
Fixed baseline

Blind comparison / 1 of 3

Which would you eat?

Choose by appearance. The recipe levels stay hidden until you finish.

Three choices. No universal right answer.

Method note A small, deterministic preference experiment. Your choices stay in this browser. This is a demonstration of alignment, not a trained model.

Your lab notebook

RunPreferenceRecipeMatchBaseline
No saved runs yet. Your next breakfast could be evidence.

Saved on this device. Up to 20 runs.

Research, lightly browned

A better score.
For whose breakfast?

Optimization needs a target. Human preference gives it one. Our tiny laboratory makes that difference visible, one slice at a time.

001 The more-is-better fallacy

A fixed baseline always serves level 8. If you prefer level 3, extra browning moves it further from your target. In our toy metric, its match is 50%. Bigger is not a synonym for better.

002 A preference is not a universal law

Three choices narrow a range from 1–10. We round the midpoint of the remaining interval. This assumes a stable, single preferred level; three comparisons cannot establish a complete taste profile. Try again if neither sample feels right.

003 Show your working

Every export includes your three comparisons, selected levels, inferred target, recipe and score formula. Someone else can reproduce the numbers without believing a leaderboard.

A commons for better questions

Proof of taste.
Not proof of genius.

Crumb Axiom explores community-owned preference benchmarks. The planned CRUMB token would support proposal bonds and votes on which comparisons the community studies next.

The lab works today. Token issuance, a chain, governance contracts and proof submission have not been implemented. No rewards or financial returns are offered.

Download the research kit ↓

A seven-second hypothesis

Watch the experiment.

One machine. Two outcomes. A human decides.

Download film ↓

Community proof submission

SOON

Your experiment is ready to export. On-chain proof submission needs a deployed contract and signature verification; neither is connected yet.